Crime | California Calif. Supreme Court Hears Prop 8 Arguments Court weighs constitutionality of ballot initiative, effect on couples married before the ban By Newser Editors and Wire Services Posted Mar 5, 2009 1:07 PM CST Copied Jacob Whipple, right, and Drew Cloud, of Salt Lake City, Utah, walk among demonstrators during a protest on the issue of Proposition 8 in San Francisco today. (AP Photo) California Supreme Court justices heard arguments today on lawsuits seeking to overturn the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage as thousands demonstrated outside the San Francisco courthouse. Gay-rights advocates are urging the court to overturn Proposition 8 on the grounds it was put before voters improperly, or at least prematurely. The measure's sponsors argue that it would be a miscarriage of justice for the court to overturn the results of a fair election. The Supreme Court is hearing arguments on three points: Is Proposition 8 invalid because it constitutes a revision of, rather than an amendment to, the California constitution; does it violate the separation of powers doctrine; and if it's not unconstitutional, what is its effect, if any, on the marriages of same-sex couples performed before the adoption of Proposition 8? The Supreme Court's seven justices have 90 days after the oral arguments to issue a ruling. Read These Next 'No Kings' crowds oppose, mock Trump. He won $1M on first Survivor. Today, he owes $3M in taxes on it. An unwanted hiking trend for women: the 'Alpine divorce.' New trend in GLP-1 drugs: 'casual' users. Report an error